The Rosicrucian Philosophy
in Questions and Answers
Volume I
by Max Heindel
(Part 4)
Question No.  94
 
Was not the star of Bethlehem a comet?
   Answer:    No;  the Star of Bethlehem shines at midnight
of every night as it shone upon the night which is recorded in the Bible,  and may be seen  by anyone among
the wise men of today, though hidden from all others.
   The key to the mystery is this:
   The Gospels are
not simply stories of the life of an individual; they depict  dramatically
and in symbol the incidents in the path  of  attainment; they are formulas of
initiation.
   In the summertime, when the whole earth is exerting
itself to bring forth the Bread of Life for all who live upon it,  the sun is
high in the heavens, sending forth its life giving rays toward our planet.
Then all the physical activities are to the fore and man is engrossed in
material occupations necessary  to his existence.   But when in winter the sun
is below the  equator and nature slumbers,  spiritual influences sent forth
from the sun are  most potent.  When the physical darkness increases the
spiritual light burns more brightly and culminates in the birth of saviors on
the darkest night in  the year,  between  the twenty-fourth and the twenty-
fifth of December, at the time the sun starts on its journey northward to
save humanity from the  cold and famine which would result if it remained in
the southern latitudes.
   On that particular night of the year the spiritual
vibrations are  strongest.  It is the holy night of the year par excellence.
On that night it is easiest for the neophyte to come into conscious touch with
spiritual  vibrations.  Therefore it was customary to take neophytes into the
temples on yon Holy  Night.   There they were entranced under the guidance of
wise men  and taught to leave their bodies consciously by an act of will.
The earth then became  transparent  to  their  gaze  and they saw  behind  it
the Sun at midnight — the blazing star.   Not,  of course,  the physical
sun,  but  the spiritual  sun which is the true Christ-star,  for the cosmic
Christ is  the highest Initiate among the luminous sun spirits, the
Archangels.
What were the gifts of the wise men?
   Answer:   The
Bible tells us that they were gold, myrrh and frankincense.
Gold has always been regarded as the emblem of spirit
in the old  legends and  symbology.   In the story of the Ring of the
Niebelung,  dramatized  by Wagner,  we hear how the Rhine maidens played in
their watery element on the bottom of the river Rhine.   The water was lighted
by the flame of the gold. This  legend takes us back to the time when these
children of the mist  were living  in the beautiful conditions of early
Atlantis,  where they were  one vast  brotherhood,  innocent and childlike,
and the Universal Spirit had not yet drawn into the separate bodies.
   The gold resting upon the rock at the bottom of the
water was the  symbol of  the Universal Spirit illuminating all mankind.
Later it is stolen  and welded into a ring by Alberich, the Niebelung, who
forswears love to possess this  gold.   Then it becomes the symbol of the
separate Ego in the  present loveless age of selfishness.  The man who has
become wise and sees the evils of  selfishness offers gold to the Christ as a
symbol of his desire for  the return to the Universal spirit of Love.
   The second gift,  myrrh,  is an aromatic plant growing in Arabia which is very rare and scarce.  It is the symbol of the soul.  We are told in legends of saints who have been so holy that they emitted an aroma.  This is thought to be a pious fable,  but it is an actual fact that a man may become so holy that he emits a most beautiful perfume.
   The third gift,  frankincense,  is a symbol of the dense body,  which has been etherealized by a holy life, for frankincense is a physical vapor.  The minister of the interior of Serbia,  one of the conspirators who planned the regicide in that country less than a decade ago, has since written his memoirs.   It appears,  according to him,  that when
they burned incense at the time they invited people to join them in their
conspiracy,  they  invariably succeeded in winning over the one whom they
sought.  He did not know why, he simply mentioned it as a curious coincidence.
But to the esotericist the matter is plain.
   No spirit can work in any world without a vehicle made
of the material of that world.  To function in the Physical World, to fetch
and carry,  we must have  a  dense body and a vital body;  both are made of
various  grades  of physical  matter,  solids,  liquids,  gas  and  ether.  We
may  obtain such vehicles in the ordinary way, by going through the womb to
birth,  or we may extract ether from the body of a medium and temporarily use
that to  materialize,  or we may use the fumes of incense.   In the Catholic
Church,  where certain spirits are invoked,  incense furnishes the vehicle
whereby they may operate upon the assembled congregation as the discarnate
spirits did to favor the Serbian regicides.
   Thus we see that the gifts of the wise men are spirit, soul and body, devoted to the service of humanity.  To give oneself is to imitate Christ,  to follow in His steps.
Was not Jesus a Jew?   If so, what did he mean by saying "Before Abraham was, I am"?  For even if He reincarnated, Abraham was the father of the Jewish race.
   Answer:    In olden times,  and even up to the present
day,  patriotism is looked  upon  as one of the prime virtues,  but from the
esoteric  standpoint there is of course but the One Spirit,  and the races are
but an  evanescent phase of the scheme of evolution; in fact, a very dangerous
phase, for while in the Periods and great Epochs of evolution there is an
abundance of  time, and it is possible for the leaders to bring most of the
spirits in line  for promotion,  the races and nations are born and die in
such  a  comparatively short  time,  there is great danger that the spirits
may become enmeshed  in the race bodies and not follow the bulk of humanity in
their progress.
   The  Christ  combated this idea of identity with the race when  he  said, "Before Abraham was, I am."  The Ego existed before
Abraham;  Abraham was an incarnation of an Ego,  a spirit.   He,  and the
Jewish race descended  from him,  were simply bodies,  but the Egos which
inhabited them existed  before the  race  bodies.   Thus the Christ advised
his hearers to  look  from  the evanescent to the eternal.
   In another place He said, "Unless a man leave Father
and mother,  he cannot follow me."   Father and mother are also race bodies.
We have no right to leave dependent relatives to follow the higher life;  we
must fulfil  all our  duties here before we selfishly take up the study of the
higher  life, but we are not to identify ourselves with the race, the nation,
or the family into which we are born.  Every one of us is an individual spirit,  which existed before the bodies we call races and will exist after they have ceased to be.   Failing to keep that fact in mind,  we may crystallize  and stay with the race instead of progressing.
Jesus was baptized at thirty, receiving the  "Christ Spirit."   Please explain this baptism.
   Answer:    The earth has not always been as it is now.
Science tells  us that  there  was  a  time when it was blended firemist.  The Bible goes back even  further and speaks
of a time before that mist,  when the earth  became glowing and luminous as
fire; a time when darkness reigned.
   There  have been in all four epochs or stages in this
development of  the earth.   First there was this dark stage, which is called
in the Rosicrucian terminology the "Polarian"  Epoch.   Then the substance
which now forms  the earth was a dark mass,  hot and gaseous.   In the second
stage,  called  the Hyperborean Epoch, this dark mass was ignited.  We are
told "God said:  'Let there be light,' and there was light."  Then came the
stage when the heat of this firemist in contact with cold space generated
moisture,  and this moisture  was  densest near the fiery core, where it was
heated  to  steam  that rushed  outward from the center — "God divided the
waters from  the  waters," that is, the dense water nearest the core from the
light steam outside.  Finally there cam an incrustation,  such as always takes
place where water  is boiled over and over again, and thus the crust over the
earth, the dry land, was formed.
   When that crust had been completed,  there was no
water upon the  surface of the earth, but as the Bible says, "A mist went up from the
surface,"  and no  herb had yet grown upon the face of the earth.   At that
time,  however, vegetation began to appear and nascent humanity lived there.
But they were not a humanity constituted as we are today.   Their form was
very much  different  and they were not nearly as evolved as we are at the
present  time. In fact,  body and spirit were not perfectly together;  the
spirits  hovered partly outside and therefore "man's eyes had not yet been
opened."
   Old  folk stories such as we hear of in Germany and
different  places  in the Old World,  speak of them as the niebelungen.
"Niebel"  means mist and "ungen" is children.  They were the  "children of the mist," for the clear atmosphere of today did not then exist; the Sun
appeared like an arc lamp in the street on a very foggy day,  on account of
the density of the mist which rose from the earth.
   While  humanity lived in that state,  they were not as
far advanced  mentally as we are now.  They could not see things outside
themselves, but they had  an  inner perception.   They saw the soul qualities
of  all  who  lived around them and they perceived themselves as spiritual
rather than material. At that time there were no nations at all,  but humanity
was one vast brotherhood.  All were partially outside their bodies and
therefore in touch with the  Universal Spirit,  which has now been obscured in
the  separateness  of egotism  which causes each man to feel himself distinct
and apart  from  all the rest of humanity; where brotherhood is forgotten and
selfishness rules.
   When  any one has progressed so far that he
appreciates the blessings  of brotherhood,  where he endeavors to abolish
egotism and cultivate  altruism, he  may go through the rite of baptism.  He
enters the water as a symbol  of his return to the ideal conditions of
brotherhood which existed when all humanity lived, so to speak, in water.
Therefore, we see Jesus, the herald of universal Brotherhood,  at the
beginning of his ministry entering the waters of  the Jordan and being
baptized there.  When he rose from the waters,  the Universal Spirit rested
upon Him as a dove, and from that time on he was not simply  Jesus,  but
Christ Jesus,  the potential Savior of the world  imbued with the Universal
Spirit, which shall eventually take away all the evils of selfishness  and
restore mankind to the blessings of brotherhood which  will be realized when
the Universal Spirit has become immanent in all mankind.
In your teaching you state that we stay for a time,  avergaing about one-third of the length of the Earth life in purgatory in order that our sins may be expiated prior to going to heaven. How then do you reconcile this teaching with the words of the Christ to the dying thief:   "Today thou shalt be with me in paradise"?
   Answer:  The New
Testament was written in Greek,  a language in which no punctuation  marks
are used.   The punctuation marks in our Bible have  been inserted  by  our
later  Bible  translators,  and  punctuation  often  very radically changes
the meaning of a sentence, as the following story will illustrate:
   In  a prayer meeting some one handed in a request
which the  pastor  read thus:   "A sailor going to sea, his mother-in-law
desires the prayers of the congregation  for his safe return to wife and
child."   The request was  not punctuated  at all,  but would imply that the
young man's mother-in-law  was very solicitous to have him return safely to
his wife and child and  therefore  desired  the  prayers of the congregation.
Had the  pastor  read  it without the comma,  it would have implied that the
sailor,  going to see his mother-in-law,  desired the prayers of the
congregation for his safe  return to wife and child,  and one would naturally
think that the lady in  question must be a Tartar when it was necessary for
the young man to ask the  prayers of the congregation before facing her.  In
this case, if the words of Christ are  read thus:   "Verily I say unto thee
today,  thou shalt be with  me  in Paradise," they would imply that the thief
would be  with the Christ at some future time not defined.  But where the
comma is placed before the world today, as in the Bible, it gives the idea ordinarily held by
people.
   That  this  idea  is absolutely wrong can be seen by
the  remark  of  the Christ  just after His resurrection,  when He said to the
woman,  "Touch  me not,  for I have not yet ascended to my Father."   If He
promised the  Thief that  he  should be with Him in Paradise on the day of the
crucifixion  and three days later declared that He had not yet been there,
the Christ  would have been guilty of a contradiction which,  of course,  is
an impossibility. Placing  of the comma as suggested fully reconciles the
meaning of  the  two passages, and besides Peter tells us that in the interval
He worked with the Spirits in Purgatory.
What is the esoteric meaning of the two theives and the cross?
Answer:    Contrary to the ordinarily accepted opinion,  the four  Gospels are not at all the biography
of Jesus, the Christ; they are Formulas of initiation  of  four  different
Mystery Schools, and in  order  to  veil  their esoteric meaning, the life and
ministry of the Christ  is also intermingled. That  could be easily done as
all initiates,  being cosmic characters,  have similar  experiences.   It is
truly said that unto the multitude the  Christ spoke in parables, but the
hidden meaning was given to His disciples in private.   Paul also gave the
milk to the weak and the meat to the strong ones. It  was  never intended at
any time to give the hidden symbols  to  ordinary people,  or to make the
Bible "an open book of God,"  as people nowadays believe.
   When  reading in the memory of nature,  we find that
at the time  of  the crucifixion, there were not only two, but a number, who
were crucified.  The people of that time meted out capital punishment for the
slightest  offenses and there were always plenty to suffer these barbarous
deaths.  Thus,  those who wanted to veil the hidden meaning of the gospels
were at no loss to find something  wherewith to fill out the tale and obscure
the points  which  are really  vital  in the crucifixion.   The part of the
story relating  to  the thieves is,  therefore,  a true incident, without
having anything to do with the esoteric meaning at all.
What is the meaning of the cross?  Is it simply an instrument of torture as usually taught in the orthodox religion?
   Answer:    Like  all other symbols,  the meanings of
the cross  are  many. Plato gave one of these meanings when he said, "The
Worldsoul is crucified," that is to say:  We have four kingdoms in the world —
the mineral, the plant, the animal and the man.
   The  mineral kingdom ensouls all chemical substance of
whatever kind,  so that the cross,  of whatever material it is made,  is first
a symbol of that kingdom.
   The upright lower limb of the cross is a symbol of the
plant kingdom  because  the currents of the group spirits which give life to
the plants  come from the center of the earth where these group spirits are
located and reach out toward the periphery of our planet and into space.
   The upper limb of the cross is the symbol of man,
because the life  currents  of the human kingdom pass downward from the sun
through the  vertical spine.   Thus  man is the inverted plant, for as the
plant  takes  its  food through the root, passing it upward, so does the man take his nourishment by way of the head,  passing it downward.  The plant is chaste,  pure and  passionless,  and  stretches  its  creative organ,  the
flower,  chastely  and unashamed toward the Sun, a thing of beauty and
delight.  Man turns his passion filled generative organ toward the Earth.
Man inhales the life giving oxygen and exhales the poisonous carbon dioxide.
The plant takes the poison exhaled by man, building its body therefrom, and
returning  to us the elixir of life, the cleansed oxygen.
   Between  the  plant  and the human kingdom stands  the
animal  with  the horizontal  spine,  and  in the horizontal spine the life
currents  of  the animal  group  spirit play as they circle around our globe.
Therefore  the horizontal limb of the cross is the symbol of the animal
kingdom.
   In  esotericism the cross was never looked upon as an
instrument of  torture,  and it was not until the sixth century that the
crucified Christ  was shown  in pictures.   Previous to that time the symbol
of the Christ  was  a cross  and a lamb resting at its foot, to convey the
idea that at  the  time when  the Christ was born the sun at the vernal
equinox crossed the  equator in the sign Aries,  the Lamb.   The symbols of
the different religions  have always  been  made  in that way.   At the time
when the  sun  by  precession crossed  the vernal equinox in the sign Taurus,
the Bull,  a  religion  was founded  in Egypt where they worshiped the Bull
Apis in the same sense  that we worship the Lamb of God.   At a much earlier
date,  we hear of the  norse God Thor driving his twin goats across the sky.
That was at the time  when the vernal equinox was in the sign Gemini,  the
Twins.   At the time of  the birth  of Christ,  the vernal equinox was in
about 7 degrees of  Aries,  the Lamb,  therefore our Savior was called the
Lamb of God.  There was a dispute in  the  earlier centuries regarding the
propriety of having the lamb  as  a symbol of our Savior.  Some claimed that
the vernal equinox at His birth was really  in the sign Pisces,  the Fishes,
and that the symbol of  our  Savior should have been a fish.   It is in memory
of that dispute that the bishop's miter still takes the form of the head of a
fish.
Could not the mission of Christ have been accomplished without such a drastic method as the crucifixion?
   Answer:   It could, of course, have been accomplished without the specific method  of  crucifixion,  but it was an absolute necessity that the blood should flow.   There are various grades of teachers and they require different  conditions for the accomplishment of their task.   Some teachers,  like Moses  and the Buddha,  come to a nation
and help it to a certain  a  point, they themselves growing thereby; and both
of the teachers mentioned attained to  the point in their own development
where their bodies  became  luminous. We  hear how the face of Moses shone so that it become necessary for him  to use  a  veil,.   The Buddha become
luminous at the time of his  death.   The Christ attained the stage of
luminosity at the time of His  transfiguration, and  it  is very significant
that the most important part of His  work,  His suffering and death, took
place after the event of the transfiguration.  And while it become necessary
for Moses, Elijah,  Buddha and the other  previous teachers to be born in a
physical body and will not need again to take  upon Himself  such  an
instrument.   For when the spirit leaves the body  in  the natural  way it
takes along certain impurities as it slowly  withdraws  from the congealing
blood.  Even in such a pure body as the body of Jesus,  there were impurities,
and the violent death which caused the blood to run liberated  the Ego of
Christ from the blood with a quick wrench,  leaving  behind whatever impurity
there may have been, so that the Christ  emerged  from the body of Jesus
unsullied and without the time of destiny usually attendant on life in the
dense body.
   On  the same principle it is a fact that although at
the present time  we have  wars  that are to be regretted from the mere human
standpoint,  it  is nevertheless  a fact which is patent to the esotericist that
these  wars  have cleansed the blood of the race considerably,  so that
gradually humanity  is becoming less and less passionate and more and more
spiritual.   Also we may say  that  in  this  fact lies the redeeming feature
of  the  slaughter  of animals.   When humanity went through the animal stage
it had no red passion filled  blood  as  our animals have;  we were not as
highly  evolved.   The animals of today,  though behind us in evolution, are
on a higher spiral and while we now are suffering under the law of consequence
because of having to overcome our passions in our own strength,  the animals
are being helped and held  in check by their group spirits.  And when they
reach the human  stage in the Jupiter Period,  they will be a higher humanity,
free from the  passions which have made this world such a sorrowful place.
thus nature always transmutes whatever evil we may commit into a higher good.
   Answering the question,  we may therefore say that in
the case of  Christ the  violent  death was necessary because it enabled the
Christ  Spirit  to withdraw from the body of Jesus without retaining any of
the impurities  attached to that merely human vehicle.
According to the Rosicrucian Teaching, when will Christ come again?
   Answer:   The Bible says truly that the "day and the hour knoweth no man," and the
people who have been trying to fix a certain date or a certain  year for the
Second Coming have entirely misunderstood the object of the Christ's mission
on earth.  His teaching was given to humanity in order that the law, "An eye
for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" might be abolished — that the Law of Fear (of God) might be swallowed up by the Law of Love.  "The law and the prophets
were until Christ," it is said, but we know that even today law is, and is
necessary.   Therefore,  it is evident that law was not abolished  at the
physical  coming  of Christ.   It is the coming  of  Christ  into  "the
within,"  the inner nature of man,  that is to abolish law.   Paul speaks of
this  advent as the "Christ being formed in ye,"  and until the  Christ  has
been formed in us we are not ready for the Second Coming.   Angelus Silesuis
says:
"Though Christ a thousand times in Bethlehem be born,
And not within thyself, thy soul will be forlorn.
The cross on Golgotha thou lookest to in vain,
Unless within thyself it be set up again."
   The Second Coming of Christ depends upon how soon a
sufficient number  of people have become Christ-like and attuned to the Christ
principle. so that, as  tuning  forks of the same pitch sing together when one
is  struck,  they will be able to respond to the Christ vibrations that will
be set up at  the return of the Savior.  Therefore, this event is not to be
calculated.  Every time we endeavor to imitate Christ and fulfill His
teachings,  we are hastening His Coming; so let us thus strive.
What is meant by the saying that Christ was made a high priest forever after the Order of Melchisedec?
   Answer:    We are told that this Melchisedec was king
of Salem and also  a high priest.   We are told that his priesthood was far
above that of  Aaron, for it was unchangeable,  while that of Aaron and the
Levites was subject to frequent change.
   During  the times of which we have records in history,
there has  always been  a division of the temporal and the ecclesiastical
powers.   Moses  was the  temporal  ruler and leader of the Jewish people,
while Aaron  was  the priest who looked after their spiritual welfare,  and
down the ages this division of the church and the state has ever been
apparent,  at times causing great  strife and bloodshed,  for their interests
seem ever to be  diametrically opposite.   But at the time of this
Melchisedec, king of Salem,  which interpreted means "peace,"  there was no such division, the two offices were combined  in  one individual.   The story
of Melchisedec,  a  Being  without earthly pedigree,  refers, of course, to
the time in early Atlantis when humanity  had not yet been divided into
warring nations,  but were  one  vast, peaceful brotherhood, and the leaders
of the people were Divine Beings,  who were both kings and priests.
   The later division of church and state has been one of
the most  fruitful sources  of  enmity and war among humanity,  for each of
these  powers  has striven  for supremacy over the other,  while in reality
there should be  no prejudice,  for no one who is not as spiritual as a priest
should be is  fit to rule as a king, and no one who is not as wise and just as
a  king  should be  is fit to have the spiritual guidance of humanity as the
priests  have. When these qualities are combined in one leader again,  the
reign of universal peace and brotherhood will become a fact.   The Christ has
been heralded as such a leader, capable of uniting church and state as king
and priest after the order of Melchisedec.   His Second Coming inaugurates the
millennium, the age of peace and joy,  where the symbolical New Jerusalem,  the
city  of peace  (for  Jer-u-salem,  means "there shall be peace"),  reigns
over  the nations of the earth, united into one universal brotherhood.  There
shall be Peace on Earth and Goodwill among Men.
What did Christ mean when He said, "All who came before Me were thieves and robbers"?
   Answer:    We read in the Bible about two great cities,
strangely similar yet directly opposite.  One is the city of Babylon, the
birthplace of confusion,  where mean ceased to be brothers and separated from
one another.   It lies upon seven hills by a river and is ruled over by a
king.   Lucifer — the "day star" — the light giver.  His fall from heaven is
lamented  exceedingly in  the fourteenth chapter of Isaiah, and later on we hear of the  fall
of that great city, which has become an abomination, is called a harlot,
having caused war, trouble and desolation among all the people of the earth.
   Then,  in supreme antithesis,  we are told of another
city called the New Jerusalem, which occupies the honored position as bride.
in that city there is not a flowing river but a sea of glass.   It also lies
upon seven  hills, is ruled over by another light giver who is called "the
light of the world," and it is a city of peace where the gates are never
closed although the precious Tree of Life is within.  This city is not a city
of this world,  but a city which has come down from heaven.
   To  understand this symbology,  it is necessary to go
back into  the  far distant past when man-in-the-making had not yet attained
the development  he has today.   When he first came upon this earth the dense
body was built  in the Polarian Epoch,  and was vitalized by the
interpenetration of  a  vital body  in  the Hyperborean Epoch.   At that time
man was  like  the  Angels, male-female,  a complete creative unit,  able to
create from himself by projecting his whole creative forces — which is love.
   Later it becomes necessary for man to evolve a brain,
and in order to accomplish that object one-half of his creative force was
turned inward in order to build the necessary organs.  From that time on, man
must seek the cooperation  of some one having the other half of the sex force
available  for propagation.  Now he loves selfishly to obtain the cooperation
of another in propagation;  the  other half of the creative force wherewith he
built  his brain and larynx he also uses selfishly to think,  because he
desires to obtain knowledge.
   Previously  man had projected his whole creative force
without  reserve, unselfishly.   Since the division of the sex force man has
eventually become selfish and therefore by attraction a prey to others of like
nature.
   The  Angels were the humanity of the Moon Period and
have since  attained to their present high development,  but as in every great
company there  are stragglers,  so also in the case of the Angels there were
some who  did  not attain — a  class of beings which were behind the Angels but
above  humanity. They were in a sad state,  for they could not follow the
present development of  the Angels and neither could they sink as low into
matter as man.   They could not,  as the Angels, dispense with a brain, yet
they were incapable of building one for themselves,  so when humanity evolved
the brain and  spinal cord  they saw an opportunity in woman,  who expresses
the negative pole  of the creative force,  imagination,  the faculty which
enables her to build  a body in the womb.   In order to gain access to her
consciousness this intelligence took advantages of a perplexity then
disturbing the woman on account of her exercise of the imaginative faculty.
   At  that  time the eyes of humanity had not yet been
opened;  they  were spiritual beings,  not quite conscious of the possession
of a physical body. The woman was the first to dimly observe that she and
others possessed  such an  instrument,  and  she had observed that at certain
times  some  of  her friends whom she had previously perceived as having this
physical appendage, had lost it,  so she was troubled.   From the Angels she
could obtain no information,  but this intelligence which appeared within
herself in the  serpentine spinal cord,  enlightened her, and "the serpent
said unto the woman, 'Hath God said, ye shall not eat of every Tree in the
Garden?'" to which she answered that they had been forbidden "to eat  of the
Tree of Knowledge" under penalty of death.  But the serpent said:  "Ye shall
not surely die,  for God knows that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes
shall be opened and ye shall be as gods,  knowing good and evil."   The woman
secured the  cooperation  of  the  man according to the instructions of
Lucifer,  the Light Giver,  and since then their eyes have been opened, they
have known good and evil.   But prior to that time man had been unconscious of
the possession of his body;  it had fallen away from him at times,  as the
leaf falls from the tree,  without inconveniencing or disturbing him,  for his
consciousness had been focused in the Spiritual World at all times.   But the
Lucifer  spirits desired a power over him, a foothold in his brain and spinal
cord.  They incited  him to break away from the yoke of the Angels and take
the  creative function in his own hands.   By the oft repeated and ignorant
abuse of  that faculty the consciousness of man was withdrawn from the
Spiritual Worlds and focused in the Physical World.   Then came death in all
its present  terrible aspects,  for man now regards this earth life as the
only real  life.   When that  ends,  he enters an existence of which he knows
nothing and  which  he consequently fears.
    Thus, on account of listening to Lucifer, the false light giver, man has become subject to sorrow,  pain and death.  He has been
robbed of his  innocence and peace.   The Christ came into the world to save
humanity from sin, sorrow and death.  Therefore He called Himself the True Light,  and the others,  who had come before, He characterized as thieves and
robbers, for they had  robbeed man of the spiritual sight though they had
enlightened  him  in the physical sense.
What did the Christ mean when He said,  "Whosoever shall not receive the Kingdom of God as a little child shall not enter therein"? 
   Answer:    In the world around us we see the kingdom of
men,  where  every one  is  endeavoring to maintain his own position and
depends upon  his  own ideas  and his own self-assertion to hold that position
against all  comers. When anything new is presented to him, his mental
attitude is usually tinged with skepticism.  He fears to be deceived.
   The  attitude of a little child with regard to what it
sees or  hears  is exactly the reverse of the position of its elders.   The
little child has no overwhelming  sense of its own superior knowledge,  but is
frankly  ignorant and therefore eminently teachable,  and it was to this trait
that the Savior referred in the passage quoted.
   When  we enter the higher life,  we must first forget
everything that  we knew in the world.   We must commence to look at things in
an entirely  different way, and when a new teaching is brought before us we must endeavor to receive it regardless of other facts previously observed.
This  in  order that we may be perfectly unbiased.   Of course,  we are not
supposed to  believe offhand that "black is white,"  but if some one seriously
asserts that an object which we have hitherto regarded as black is really
white, our mind should be sufficiently open to prevent us from passing
judgment at once  and saying,  "Why,  I know that that object is black."   We
should be willing to reexamine the object to see if there may not be a  point
of view whence that thing  which we have thought black appears to be white.
Only when we  have made thorough examination and have found that the thing is really black from whatever point of view may we return to our previous
opinion.
   There is nothing so remarkable about a child as the
flexible attitude  of its mind which renders it so teachable, and the pupil
who endeavors to  live the  higher life should always aim to keep his mind in
that  fluidic  state, for as soon as our ideas have become set and incapable of being changed, our progress ceases.   That was the great truth which the Christ was endeavoring to  present to his hearers when he made the remark which has occasioned  the question.
Did not Jesus eat fish?  Why then are the Rosicrucians vegetarians?
   Answer:   After the Resurrection the Christ at one time
appeared among His disciples while they were in a locked room.   They did not
recognize Him  at once and did not believe that His was a material body.   But
the vehicle  in which He appeared was the vital body of Jesus, and  it was
possible for Him, as for anyone else capable of functioning in that vehicle,
to draw matter of the  chemical  region around Himself and build a perfectly
tangible,  dense body in a moment.  In order to convince them that He was as
usual,  He asked for something to eat and was given a piece of a honeycomb and
some fish.  It is stated that he ate,  but not that he ate the fish,  and one
who had  been brought  up among strict vegetarians like the Essenes would not
have  eaten the  fish any more than he would have eaten flesh if it had been
set  before him.
   It is also related of the Buddha that he died after
gorging himself  upon boar's  flesh,  which is highly amusing to anyone aware
of the fact that  he taught his disciples the simple and harmless life — to
sustain the body  upon the  purest  and best foods as they come directly from
the  ground — and  was moved  to the greatest pity at the sight of suffering on
the part of man  or beast.   The esoteric student understands that in olden
times the boar was a symbol of the esoteric knowledge.   One may give of his
knowledge;  the more we  give the more we have — at least the same amount of
knowledge always  remains.   This  truth  was taught in a symbol of  the
Norse  mythology:   In Valhall the warriors who had fought the good fight were
seated around tables feasting upon the flesh of a boar, which was so
constituted that as often as they cut a part of its flesh away the flesh grew
out at once,  so that there was always plenty, no matter how much was taken or
how many ate.  The Buddha in his earth life had gorged himself upon this
sacred knowledge, and when he died he was full thereof.
   Nevertheless,  the inquirer has a wrong idea.   The Rosicrucians  do  not teach that everyone should be a vegetarian at once.  In fact they teach that the vegetarian diet generates an abundance of energy,  much more than  flesh foods.  This  energy  is  not  only physical but
spiritual, so that if a man leads a sedentary life and is of a material
disposition,  engaged,  perhaps, in  sordid business transactions or in other
lines of strictly material  endeavor,  this spiritual energy can find no vent
and is apt to cause systemic disturbances.   Only  those  who live an active,
outdoor  life,  where  the abundance  of energy generated by the vegetarian
food can be thrown off,  or who  transmute that energy into spiritual
endeavor,  can thrive on the  vegetarian diet.   Besides,  we recognize that
the heredity of many generations has  made  man partly carnivorous,  so that
in the case of most  people  the change  from a mixed diet to vegetables
should be gradual.   The diet  which suits  one  man is not fitted for
another, vide the old proverb  that  "one man's meat is another man's
poison,"  and no hard and fast rules can be laid down which will apply equally
to all people.  Therefore,  everything that we eat as well as everything else
connected with our personality should be  determined by ourselves
individually.
   The Bible  says
truly that is not that which goeth into the  mouth  that defileth us.   If we
crave and support ourselves upon loathsome food,  it is the craving that is the sin,  and not the food itself.   If a man is  in  a place where he cannot
obtain the pure foods which he desires and craves,  he ought to take the food
which is obtainable, even flesh food,  without loathing,  just as thankfully
as he takes the pure food.   It will not defile him because of his attitude of
mind.
If Christ fed the multitude with fish,  why is it wrong for us to use them, or even flesh, as food?
   Answer:   It is the nature of a beast of prey to eat
any animal that comes in its path,  and its organs are such that it must have
that kind of a  diet to exist, but everything is in a stage of becoming; it is
always changing to something higher.   Man, in his earlier stages of
unfoldment,  was also like the beasts of prey in certain respects;  however,
he is to become  God-like and thus he must cease to destroy at some time in
order that he may commence to  create.
   We have been taught that there is no life in the
universe but the life of God.   That  "in Him we live and move and have our
being."   That  His  life animates  everything that is and therefore we
naturally understand  that  as soon  as  we  take life we are destroying the form built  by  God  for  His manifestation.   The  lower  animals are
evolving spirits  and  have  sensibilities.  It is their desire for experience
that causes them to build their various forms,  and when we take their forms away from theme we deprive them of their opportunity for gaining experience. We hinder their evolution instead of helping them.   It is excusable in the cannibal,  who knows no better, when he eats his fellow men.  We  now  regard cannibalism with horror, and the day will also come when we shall feel a like disgust at the  thought of  making  our  stomachs the burying ground of the
carcasses  of  murdered animals.
   It  is  natural that we should desire the very best of
food,  but  every animal body has in it the poisons of decay.  The venous
blood is filled with carbon dioxide and other noxious products on their way to
the kidneys or the pores of the skin to be expelled as urine or perspiration.
These loathsome substances  are in every part of the flesh and when we eat
such food we  are filling our own bodies with toxic poisons.  Much sickness is
due to our  use of flesh foods.
   When we cry to the Bible as authority for flesh eating we should also  be willing  to follow
its injunctions and stop eating pork,  which is the  most horrible food of
all.   It is a notable fact that the orthodox Jews who  abstain  from the
foods interdicted in the Bible are immune  from  consumption and cancer.
   In a great many places where the  Bible speaks of "meat," it is very plain
that  flesh food is not meant.   The chapter in
Genesis where man's food  is first allotted to him says that he should eat
of every tree and herb bearing seed,  "and to you it shall be for meat."   The most evolved people  at  all times have abstained from flesh foods.  We see,
for instance,  Daniel,  who was a holy man and a wise man,  beg that he might
not be forced to eat meat, but  that he and his companions be given pulse.
The children of Israel  in the wilderness are spoken of as "lusting after
flesh,"  and their God is angry with them in consequence.
   There  is an esoteric meaning to the feeding of the
multitude where  fish was  used as food,  but looking to the purely material
aspect we may sum  up the points made in our answer by reiterating that we
shall some time outgrow flesh and fish eating as we have risen above
cannibalism.   Whatever license may  have been given in the barbaric past will
disappear in  the  altruistic future,  when more refined sensibilities shall
have awakened us to a  fuller sense of the horrors involved in the
gratification of a carnivorous taste.
   For  a very full presentation of the question,  "Does
the Bible  justify Flesh Eating," we
would refer the inquirer to a little pamphlet by that name issued by the Unity
Society of Kansas City,  Missouri,  which gives the  pro and the con with
great impartiality, and shows that it was only as a concession to the before
mentioned lust for flesh that the practice was  tolerated at all.
Please explain why the fatted calf was not killed for the righteous son instead of the prodigal.  Was that not giving a reward for wrong doing?
   Answer:    The story of the prodigal son was a parable
whereby the  Christ intended  to  teach a lesson and not an actual fact.   It
is a  story  which tells  of  the  spirit's pilgrimage through  matter.
There  are  different classes  of  spirits.  Some,  but  not  all,  have  gone
into the school of experience,  the world.   They have descended from their
high estate in  the World of God gradually deeper and deeper into the sea of
matter which blinds them.   At  last they find themselves enmeshed in the
dense  matter  of  the Physical World.  That is the turning point where they
wake up; where the unconscious path of involution ends; where self-
consciousness is attained plus a consciousness of the world without.   But the
spirit within is not content to remain in this world.  Re-awakened to a sense
of its inherent divinity it feels drawn anew to the highest spheres, and says
"I will arise and go to my father."
   Then comes the toil of stripping off the various
vehicles in which it has become  enmeshed and of raising itself once more to
the conscious  communion with  God.   While engaged in this arduous task "the
Father meets it a  long way off";  the still small voice from within begins to
speak and tell of the heavenly  glories and,  at last,  when either the
evolution of humanity  has been  completed or the single spirit has taken the
short cut of initiation, there is a reunion with God and the other brothers
who have not yet gone out into the school of experience.   Naturally there is
more rejoicing over  the return  of one who has fought the good fight and has
come back to his  heavenly home,  than over the one who has not yet sought to
improve his opportunity.
Why did the Lord commend the unjust steward as related in the sixteenth chapter of St. Luke?
   Answer:    The inquirer should read the chapter
carefully.  We are told of an  unfaithful steward who was brought before his
master,  the latter  being suspicious that his accounts were not quite right.
This unfaithful steward made a bargain with the debtors of his master to
secure himself against  the day  of discharge from his position.   It is said
in verse 8 that "the  lord commended the unjust steward."   When he rendered
his accounts he must  have fixed them so skilfully that his master was
deceived, for the "lord"  of the man — his  master — was the one who commended
him,  as will be seen  from  the fact  that  the  word "lord"  is spelled with
a small  letter,  whereas  the capital letter is always used where the Christ
is signified.
Please explain what is meant by sinning against the Holy Ghost.
   Answer:    Speaking generally,  the Holy Spirit is the
creative  power  of God.  For confirmation,  remember the passage in the creed
"Conceived by the Holy Spirit,"  which Gabriel said to Mary should come upon
her.  By that all that is has been brought into being,  and it is a ray from
that attribute of God which is used by men for perpetuation of the race.  When
that is abused, that is to say, when it is used for sense gratification,
whether in solitary or  associated vice,  with or without the legal marriage,
that is  the  sin against the Holy Spirit.  That sin, we are told, is not
forgiven; it must be expiated.   Humanity  as  a whole is now suffering for
that  sin.   The  debilitated  bodies,  the sickness that we see around us,
has been caused  by centuries of abuse,  and until we learn to subdue our
passions there can  be no  true  health  among the human race.  We have been
born  of  parents  who thought  that it was right to gratify their passions at
any and  all  times. In  consequence we suffer now,  and by our attitude
toward the sex  question most  of  us are at the present time conferring the
same maladies  upon  our children.   Thus the sins of the fathers are being
visited upon the children from generation to generation, and will continue to
bring sorrow and suffering  until we shall understand that every child has a
right to be well  born and to receive the proper physical conditions during
the period of antenatal life.
Is the Christian creed based upon divine authority?
   Answer:    There are three forms of the Christian
creed.   One of them  is known  as the Apostle's Creed,  although not composed
by the  apostles,  but supposed to embody their beliefs.   Another creed was
formulated and adopted at the Council of Nice and is called the Nicene Creed.
The Athanasian Creed was of still later date.   They have no more divine
authority than any other contention of men concerning the Bible.
   The Bible itself
gives a creed, however, in the passage which states that there is no other name given except the name of Christ Jesus whereby men may be saved,  and this is in harmony with the esoteric teaching,  for Jehovah was the  author of all the old Race Religions where the fear of God  was  pitted against the desires of the flesh and a law was imposed upon man to curb  desire.   Race Religions act educationally upon the desire nature by the means stated,  but will in time be superseded by the Religion of Christ.  This religion of brotherhood
and love will cast out the fear engendered by the  law of Jehovah.  It will endeavor to do away with nations, with their laws, with struggle and strife,
by working upon the vital body so that humanity  shall be actuated entirely by
love instead of by law.   This is not the  ultimate, however.   When the
kingdom shall have been fully established, He is to give it over to the
Father.   The Religion of the Father will be something higher even than the
Religion of the Son.
How do you reconcile the law of cause and effect with the doctrine of the forgiveness of sins?
   Answer:    The inability to believe in the forgiveness
of sins has  caused many  to believe exclusively in the law of cause and
effect,  as  taught  in eastern countries under the name karma.  There are
also many who think that, because eastern religions teach that law and the law
of rebirth more clearly than the western religion,  Christianity, these
eastern religions are better and more scientific than the western religion,
which teaches,  as popularly interpreted,  that the Christ died for our sins
and that in consequence  belief in Him will bring us forgiveness.
   As a matter of fact,  however, the Christian teaching
also enunciates the doctrine  that "as we sow so shall we also reap,"  and
thus it teaches  both the law of cause and effect and the forgiveness of sins.
Both of these laws are vitally operative in the unfoldment of humanity, and
there are good reasons  why the earlier eastern religions have only one part
of  the complete teaching which is found in the Christian religion.
   In  those early days when the religions of the East
were given to  humanity, mankind were still more spiritual in nature than the
material beings of the present day Western World.  They knew that we live many
lives in different shapes and forms here upon this earth.   In the East today
they are  yet thoroughly imbued with that idea.   Many of them are more concerned with thought of  Nirvana — the  invisible world — where they may rest  in  peace and joy, than with taking advantage of their present material resources for advancement.   As a
consequence,  their country  is arid and waste,  their crops are small and
often destroyed by  a scorching sun and devastating flood.   They suffer
famine,  they die by millions,  but although they teach the law of cause and
effect, they seem to be unaware  that their miserable conditions are brought
about by indolence  and indifference to material things.   For naturally,
when they have not worked here they have nothing to assimilate in the heaven
life between death and  a new birth, and as an organ or limb that is disused
gradually atrophies, so a country  that is not developed by the spirits
incarnated  therein  gradually atrophies and becomes useless as a habitation
for mankind.  It was necessary to  the evolution of humanity to enter this
material world and  develop  all its resources.
   Therefore, the Great Leaders have taken various means
to cause us to temporarily forget the spiritual side of our nature.   In the
West,  where  the pioneers  of the human race are found,  they commanded
marriage outside  the family.   They gave to the West a religion that did not
definitely teach the doctrine of rebirth and the law of cause and effect as
means of advancement. They also originated the use of alcohol, with its
paralyzing effect upon the spiritual sensibilities of man.   By these means we
have in the West  temporarily forgotten that there is more than this one life
on earth, and in consequence we apply ourselves with the utmost diligence to
making the  fullest possible use of what we believe to be our only opportunity
here.  Therefore, we  have developed the West into a veritable garden;  we
have made for  ourselves, between incarnations, a land that is exceedingly fertile and rich in the minerals which we need in our various industries,  and thus we are  conquering the visible material world.
   It is evident,  however, that the religious side of
man's nature must not be entirely neglected, and as Christ, the great ideal of
the Christian religion,  had been set before us for imitation,  and we could
not possible hope to become Christ-like in one life,  which is all that we now
have any knowledge of,  there must be given us a compensatory doctrine, or we
should cease to strive in despair, knowing that it would be futile.
Therefore the Western  World  was taught the doctrine of the forgiveness of
sins  through  the righteousness of Christ Jesus.
   It is equally certain,  however, that no doctrine
which is not a truth in nature can have any uplifting power,  and,  therefore,
there must also be a sound basis behind the doctrine of the forgiveness of
sins,  which seems  to vitiate the law of causation; it is this:
   When  we look about us in the material world,  we
observe  the  different phenomena of nature, we meet other people and have
various transactions with them,  and all these sights,  sounds and scenes are
observed by means of our sense organs.   Yet not all,  for we are usually
exceedingly unobservant  of details.  It is exasperatingly true when it is
said that  "we have eyes that see not and ears that hear not."  We lose a
great deal of experience on that account.   Besides, our memory is woefully
lacking; while we are able to recall  a  little,  most of our experiences are
lost to us because  we  forget them.  our conscious memory is weak.  There is
another memory, however.   As the  ether and the air carry to the photographic
plate in a camera  the  impression of the landscape without,  omitting,  not
the slightest detail,  so also does the air and the ether  which  carries
impressions from the outside to our sense organs carry into the lungs, and
thence to the blood, an actual picture  and  a record of everything with which
we come in  contact.   Those pictures are stored in the minute seed atom
resting in the left ventricle of the heart,  and that little atom may be
considered the Book of the Recording Angels, where all our deeds are
inscribed.  Thence it is mirrored in the Reflecting Ether of our vital body.
   In  the ordinary course of life,  man passes into
Purgatory at death  and inscribed upon that atom.  Later he assimilates all
the good stored there in the First Heaven,  working upon his future
environment in the Second heaven. But a devout person realizes each day his
shortcomings and failings.  He examines  the  events of this life daily and
prays from a devout heart  to  be forgiven  for sins he has committed.  Then
the pictures which have  recorded the  sins of omission and commission fade,
and are wiped out of  his  life's record  from  day to day.   For it is not
the aim of God or nature to  "get even"  as it would seem under the law of
causation,  which decrees an  exact retribution for every transgression, as
well as a reward or compensation for every  good act.   It is the aim of God
that we should learn  by  experience here to do justly and well.   When we
have realized that we have done  wrong and  determine to do better,  we have
learned the lesson,  and there  is  no necessity for punishing us.
   Thus the doctrine of the forgiveness of sins is an
actual fact in nature. If we repent, pray and reform, the sins we have
repented of,  prayed for and reformed  from are forgiven and wiped out of our
life's record.   Otherwise, they  are eradicated by corresponding pains in
Purgatory after death.   Thus the doctrine of Karma, or the law of cause and
effect as taught in the East, does not fully meet human needs, but the
Christian teaching,  which embodies both the law of causation and the doctrine of the forgiveness of sins, gives a more complete teaching concerning the method employed by the Great Leaders to instruct us.
By what power did Peter raise Dorcas from the dead?
   Answer:   Peter did not raise Dorcas from the dead,
neither did the Christ raise Lazarus or anyone else, nor did he so claim.  He
said "He is not dead, he sleepeth."
   In order that this matter may be understood,  we will
explain what  takes place at death and wherein death is different from the
state of trance,  for the persons mentioned were entranced at the time the
supposed miracles  took place.
   During the waking state,  when the Ego is functioning
consciously in  the Physical  World,  its various vehicles are concentric —
they occupy the  same space — but at night, when the body is laid down to
sleep, a separation takes place.  The Ego, clothed in the mind and desire
body, extricates itself from the dense body and the vital body, which  are
left upon the bed.  The higher vehicles hover above or near.   They are
connected to the denser vehicles by the silver cord, a thin glistening thread which takes the shape of two figure  sixes,  one end being attached to the
seed atom in the  heart  and  the other to the center vortex of the desire
body.
   At the moment of death,  this thread is ruptured at
the seed atom in  the heart  and  the  forces of this atom pass  along  the
pneumogastric  nerve, through the third ventricle of the brain, and thence
outward through the suture between the occipital and parietal bones of the
skull, along the silver cord  and into the higher vehicles.   Simultaneously
with this rupture,  the vital body is also disengaged and joins the higher
vehicles which are hovering  above  the dead body.   There it remains for
about three  and  one-half days.   Then the higher vehicles disengage
themselves from the  vital  body, which disintegrates synchronously with the
dense body, in ordinary cases.
   At  the time of this last separation, the silver cord
also breaks in  the middle, and the Ego is freed from contact with the
material world.
   During  sleep the Ego also withdraws from the dense
body,  but the  vital body remains with the dense body and the silver cord is
left intact.
   It sometimes happens that the Ego does not enter the
body in the  morning to waken it as usual,  but remains outside for a time
varying from one to an indefinite  number  of  days.   Then we say that the
body is  in  a  natural trance.   But  the silver cord is not ruptured in
either of the  two  places mentioned.   Where  these ruptures have once taken
place no  restoration  is possible.   The Christ and the apostle were
clairvoyants;  they saw that  no rupture had taken place in the cases
mentioned, hence the saying, "He is not dead, he sleepeth."  They also
possessed the power to force the Ego into its body  and restore the normal
condition.   Thus so-called miracles were  performed by them.
Do you believe in conversion?
   Answer:    Certainly, but there are conversions and
conversions.  There is the  conversion  which takes place in a revival meeting
to  the  beating  of drums,  the clapping of hands, the singing of gospel
hymns and the insistent calling of the revivalist to "come before it is too
late."   All these  aids to  conversion produce an intense hypnotic influence,
which works upon  the emotional  nature  of  many people in such a way that
these  "sinners,"  so called, can no longer remain in their seats, but are
forced in the most literal  sense to obey the command and come forward to "the  mourner's  bench." That kind of a conversion is usually of very little worth.  Revivalists find that it is extremely easy to convert people in that manner.
The exasperatingly difficult problem is, as one of them expressed it, "to make
it stick," for  when  the  victim  of  the  hypnotic revivalist leaves the
meeting, the influence  gradually  wears off,  and sooner or later he relapses
into  his original attitude.   And though these "backsliders" may feel no pang
at  all when backsliding, the next revival meeting draws them to the mourners'
bench again as surely as a magnet draws a needle.   They are converted
repeatedly and backslide regularly every time there is a revival meeting,  to
the  disgust of the revivalist and the amusement of the community,  who are
unaware that it is a simple case of mild hypnotism.
   There is another conversion, however, always
accompanied by planetary influences,  and according to the strength of these
influences the conversion, or change in the life, will be more or less
radical.  It then shows that the soul has reached a certain point in its
pilgrimage where it feels attraction to  the higher life.   The immediate
cause of conversion may be a sermon,  a lecture or a book, a verse in the
Bible, or something in nature, but that is only  the physical cause of
something which was already a fact  spiritually. From  that moment the man or
the woman will commence to take a new  view  of life, will lay aside the old
vices, will follow new lines of thought and endeavor.   It may change his
whole attitude toward life and also his environment.   In fact, very often a
journey has brought him out of the usual environment for the time being,  to
give the proper condition for sowing of  the new seed.
Is there any value in confession and absolution?
   Answer:    If the inquirer means confession and
absolution in the sense in which  it  is practiced in the Catholic Church,  it
may be stated  that  the priest, certainly, has no power to forgive the sins
of the penitent, and the practice  of confession by the order of a church at the best is usually  but an  outward  show of penitence,  putting one in mind
of the  prayer  of  the Pharisee who went into the temple that he might be
seen of men.
   If,  on the other hand,  confession is made in the
spirit of the  scribe, which is the spirit of true penitence, then there is a
certain value, for as a little child who has committed a wrong feels
conscience smitten and sorry, so may we feel extremely penitent for our sins
of omission and commission.
    It is a fact often noticed by kind parents that
penitence in silence  is sometimes  insufficient  to the child which feels the
need of going  to  the parent and confessing its sin.   When the forgiveness of the parent has been obtained its conscience is at rest.  So also with the child of God.   We sin and we are sorry for our sins; we determine not to
commit this or that wrong again; but if we can confess to someone in whom we
have faith, and get their sympathy and assurance that this wrong will not be
held against us, we shall feel easier in conscience.  That was the principle
underlying the command of the  Bible
"Confess your sins to one another."   The one to whom we  confess will,  of
course,  be a person for whom we have a profound respect and love, and he or
she will stand toward  us  at that moment as the representative of God or our
own higher nature,  and we shall thus feel very much relieved  at having
received his sympathy.   But we shall feel also that the pact we have made
with  ourselves  not  to commit the sin in  question  again  has  been
strengthened  by having him as a witness.   If confession is made thus,  and
absolution so obtained, then it has undoubtedly a very beneficial effect.
Is there any value in the Latin ritual used by the Catholic church? Would it not be better if it were translated so that people could understand?  And are not the extemporaneous sermons and prayers used in the Protestant churches much to be preferred to the ritual and stereotype masses of the Catholics?
   Answer:    At the present time all humanity has
evolved so far  that  they are  above law in some respects.   Most people obey
the law "Thou shalt  not steal," for instance.
   Law is a curb on the desire nature,  but where esoteric
or rather spiritual advancement  is contemplated,  the spiritualization of the
vital  body  must also be accomplished.  And that is attained by means of art
and religion, in oft-repeated impacts, for the keynote of the vital body is
repetition, as we can  see by looking at the plants which have only a dense body and  a  vital body.  There stem and leaf follow each other in upward
succession; the plant keeps  on growing them alternately.   it was the vital
body that  built  the vertebrae of the human spine one after another by
constant repetition.   And memory,  for instance,  which is one of the
faculties of the vital body,  is strengthened and developed by constant
iteration and reiteration.
   When the Protestants left the Catholic Church they
truly left many of the abuses behind,  but they also left almost everything of
value.   They  abandoned  the ritual which everyone may know and understand
regardless of  poor enunciation upon the part of the preacher.   Knowing the
ritual,  the  laity could send their thoughts in the same direction as the
thought of the priest who was reading,  and thus an enormous volume of
identical spiritual thought was  massed  together  and projected upon the
community for  good  or  evil. Nowadays the congregation in a Protestant
church listens to the extemporaneous  prayer or sermon of their minister, who
usually does not think so  much of the spiritual work before him as he does of
how he may turn out the  most euphonious phrases to tickle the ears of his
congregation.  They forget what he has said before they leave the church.
Those who go to a Catholic church understanding  the  ritual are still today
able to unite their  thoughts  in spiritual conclave and keep within memory
that which has been gone  through. Thus  they are every time adding a little
to the spiritualization  of  their vital bodies, while the Protestant church
members have been affected only in their  emotional  natures,  and that effect
is soon thrown out.   The  Bible tells us to pray without ceasing,  and many
have scoffed saying that if  God is omniscient He knows whereof we have need
without our prayer, and if He is not, He can most likely not be omnipotent,
and therefore our prayers are not granted, so that it is useless to pray.  But
that command was indited from a knowledge  of the nature of the vital body,
which needs that repetition  in order that it may be spiritualized.
   So  much  for the ritual.   As to the use of the
Latin  language,  it  is stated in the first chapter of John that in the
beginning was the word. .  . and without it was nothing made that was made.
Word is sound.   If we take sand or plant spores and place them upon a brass
or a glass plate, then take a  violin bow and draw it across the edges,  we
shall produce a  sound,  and that  sound will cause the spores or sand to
arrange itself  in  geometrical figures,  similar to the crystals of which all
things are  composed.   Every sound produces a different formation.   Thus, if a certain sound produces  a certain effect which we wish to produce,  we cannot change the sound without also changing the effect.   If we emit a certain sound and say "Deum,"  then translate Deum and say God,  the sound is very different,  and as sound produces certain effects upon our invisible
bodies,  the effects that were produced by the original Latin ritual have been
lost to the Protestant churches which changed it into English or dropped it
altogether.
   It is often a wonder to people how the Catholic
Church retains its  power over  its  people,  and it may be said that were
they to abandon  the  Latin ritual  there would not be one of their followers
left in ten years.   Moreover, their truly esoteric rituals have  not been
transposed into English, and even  among the Rosicrucians,  Latin rituals,
though not those used  in  the Catholic Church, are in vogue at the services.
What is the actual merit in martyrdom?   Did the martyrs really become saints?
   Answer:    Man lifts himself to a union with God through four great  steps or  stages.   First he prays to or sacrifices to a God whom  he  fears  and, therefore,  seeks to propitiate, so that his God will not harm him.  Next he learns  to look upon this God as a mighty ally
against his enemies and as  a giver of all good things to him, that is,
provided he obeys the God and sacrifices to him of the material things which
he possesses.  In the third step he is taught to sacrifice himself by living a
life of righteousness, and expects to be rewarded in a future state called
heaven, where he is to live in eternal happiness as a compensation for
whatever he may have endured  during earth life.  The martyrs were at the
stage where they held this belief,  and were  thoroughly imbued with the
verity and glory of heaven.   Therefore  it was to them an easy matter to
sacrifice  their  lives and then attain to the future glory at once.
   In reality, if martyrdom can unlock a heaven with
eternal bliss,  that is a most easy method of obtaining the reward.  It may
take courage to die, but after  all  it takes infinitely more courage to live.
We are very  apt  to think  that when a man has given his life he has given to
the  very  utmost, and we often hear people say of a man who has committed
suicide that "he has paid it all."   As a matter of fact, suicide is usually
an expression of the greatest  possible cowardice,  and martyrdom is far less
to be admired  than the  lives of people who day by day endeavor to follow the
spiritual  teachings of the Bible and live a noble life.   Of course it is
readily  admitted that  the martyrs are to be admired for staunchly adhering to
their faith  in the face of death and torture.  Undoubtedly they will have
greater  opportunities  for spiritual growth in later lives than they were
deprived of  when burned at the stake or otherwise exterminated.   And we may
also surely  say that they were saints and holy people in the sense that their
faith was even more to them than life,  but we strenuously hold that the edict
of a  church is incapable of making a sinner a saint.
In one of your lectures you said in effect that it was a mistake to send missionaries to foreign countries; that the religions practiced  by the so-called heathens are right for them at the present time, but that these missionaries have done little harm as yet.  How then do you explain the command of Christ to His apostles,  "Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel to every creature?"
   Answer:   The meaning of the Christ's words obviously
rest upon the interpretation  of  the word "world."   If by that word we
understand  the  whole earth,  it may be right to send missionaries to foreign
countries;  but  the Bible tells us that
The disciples to whom the command was given returned after  having
accomplished their mission,  showing that the word  of  command could  not
have been meant to include the whole earth.   In this  connection the word
"world"  should rather have been given the interpretation "polity," which will
also be found in some of our dictionaries as another meaning  for the  word.
At the time of Christ people did not know the whole world.   We find   even
to  this  day  the  westernmost  cape  of  Spain  called  Cape Finisterre —
the end of the Earth.   Therefore this term at the  time  when Christ spoke
his command could not have included the whole earth as we  know it today.  The
statement is, therefore, not contrary to Bible teachings.  It is wrong to send
missionaries out to the people we call "heathen," for their development  is
as yet such that they cannot understand  a  religion  which preaches  love  to
one's neighbor,  a religion which even we  have  not  yet learned to practice.
Besides, if the great Recording Angels who have charge of men's evolution are
capable of judging our needs, and placing each one in the environment where he
will find the influences most conducive to progression,  we must also believe
that they have given to each nation the religion most salutary to its
unfoldment.  Therefore, when a man has been placed in a country  where  the
Christian religion is taught,  that religion  holds  the ideal which he should
strive for,  but to try to force it upon other  people who  have  been placed
in a different sphere is to set our  judgment  up  as greater  than the
judgment of God and His ministers,  the Recording  Angels. However,  as said,
the Christian missionaries have done little harm to  the people they have
visited, but they might have done more good at home.  We do not  need to go
away from home to find heathen who need instruction  in  the Bible.   Professor Wilbur L. Cross of Yale
mentions, for instance, that in a class  of forty students not one could place
Judas Iscariot;  that he had  a Jewish student who had never heard of Moses
and that in answer to a question concerning the nature of the Pilgrim's
Progress, the best answer was that it is the basis of New England history.
If the missionaries were brought into contact with these heathen, perhaps they
might do some good.
   More  harm,  however,  is done when the East sends
its missionaries  over here  to  convert  us to Hinduism and kindred
religions,  for  often  these Hindus  teach breathing exercises which cause
insanity or consumption,  because  our western bodies are not at all fitted
for such practices.   it  is safest to rest in the religion of our country,
to study and practice  that, leaving to other nations the privilege of doing
the same in respect to their own religions.
Section V
Questions Concerning Spiritualistic Phenomena
Is mediumship injurious to health?
   Answer:   That depends:  Where a person becomes the
medium for a disembodied  spirit  which enters the body,  as in the case of
the  trance  mediums, where  it takes possession of this body and uses it as
the owner  might  do, there is little if any harm done, provided the spirit
control does not abuse his privilege.   In fact,  there are some cases where
spirit controls have a better idea of caring for a body than the owner
himself,  and may  sometimes improve  the health.   But spirits of a high
ethical nature do  not  usually control  a medium,  it is rather earthbound
and low spirits such as  Indians and  others of a like nature who obtain a
control over mediumistic  persons, and when in possession of the body they may
use it to gratify their low passions for drink and sex.   Thus they cause a
disturbance to the system and a deterioration of the instrument.
   In the case of the materializing medium, we may say
that the influence is always  injurious.   The materializing spirit entrances
the victim and  then draws the ether of the vital body out through the spleen,
for the difference between  the materializing medium and the ordinary person
is the  fact  that the connection between the vital body and the dense body is
exceedingly lax, so  that it is possible to withdraw this vital body to a very
great  extent. The  vital  body  is  the  vehicle  whereby the solar currents
which give us vitality are specialized.  Deprived of the vitalizing principle,
the body of the  medium  at the time of a materialization sometimes  shrinks
to  almost one-half  its usually size;  the flesh becomes flabby and the spark
of  life burns  very low.   When the séance is over and the vital body
replaced,  the medium is awakened and in normal consciousness.  He then
experiences a feeling of the most terrible exhaustion and sometimes,
unfortunately, resorts to drink to revive the vital forces.  In that case, of
course,  the health will very  soon suffer and the medium will become a total
wreck.   At  any  rate, mediumship should be avoided,  for apart from this
danger to the  instrument there  are other and far more serious considerations
in connection with  the more  subtle  bodies,  and particularly in connection
with  the  after-death state.
Where mediums make so-called soul trips, what is it that leaves the physical body, and can it leave in the waking state to gather data?
   Answer:    A medium is a negative or involuntary
clairvoyant and under the control  of a spirit from the Desire World.   He or
she corresponds  to  the victim of a hypnotist in the Physical  World.  In the
case of the hypnotist, he is seen by his victim in the waking state,  while
the medium does not see the  spirit which hypnotizes her until she has been
driven out of her  body. She is then clothed in her desire body and therefore
usually unable to bring her experiences back.
   All  her experiences take place while the physical
body is in  a  trance. It is the Ego clothed in the mind and desire body which
leaves the  physical body behind,  and the same separation takes place then as
in ordinary dreamless sleep, with the difference, however, that the physical
body is not left tenantless upon the bed,  but the spirit control usually
enters the physical body  of the medium,  taking possession and using it
according to  pleasure, often to the great detriment of the medium.   For when
such a spirit control has  been a drunkard or libertine during earth life,  it
will often use  the medium's  body  to gratify its craving for liquor or its
base,  sensual  instincts.   We  cannot too seriously impress upon people that
this  physical body is our most valuable instrument,  and that it is very
wrong for  anyone to  abandon it to the tender mercies of either a hypnotist
or a spirit  control.  In the case of mediums, there is a still graver danger,
for sometimes it is not an ordinary human Ego which is the control,  but an
elemental that cannot ordinarily function in the Physical World.   When the
medium at death enters  the Desire World,  the elemental has obtained such a
power over  the desire body of the medium that it may rob the owner of his
vehicle.  The desire  body is the vehicle whence comes the spring to action,
and  therefore when an Ego is deprived of that vehicle there is nothing to
cause it to  reincarnate.  The elemental may keep this body even for millions
of years, and so,  while  the  result  of  humanity  is  progressing, the
unfortunate Ego, deprived  of its desire body,  is left inert and will be far
behind all  its fellows,  perhaps,  before it is released from the bondage of
this  entity. Therefore,  mediumship is the gravest danger to the soul the
writer knows of or is able to conceive, except the practice of black magic.
I  have taken many soul flights, and on one of these journeys my guide took me through gates into a crystal city and on into a temple filled with ethereal people, saying, "This is God's holy city."  Will you kindly tell me where this is,  why there are gates and walls around the city,  and why everything looked like crystal?
   Answer:    It is one of the peculiarities of desire
stuff,  which  is  the matter of the Desire World that it is exceedingly
plastic and readily molded by thought.   In the twinkling of an eye it takes
the most different  shapes according to the thought that ensouls it,  and
where many people upon  earth think  along similar lines all their thoughts
mass themselves and  form  one grand whole.
   Thus in the lower regions of the Desire World, the
thoughts of people who believe in a fiery, furnace-like Hell make of  the
desire stuff there such a place  of torture.   There we may see devils with
horns,  hoofs  and  tails, prodding the unhappy sinners with pitchforks, and
often when people pass out at death, after having lived in that belief, they
are in a sad state of fear on beholding this place which they have helped to
create.   There is also in the  higher regions of the Desire World a city such
as you describe,  a  New Jerusalem with pearly gates,  with a sea of glass and
its great white throne upon which is seated a thought form of God,  created by
these people and appearing like an old man.  It is probable that you visited
this place,  which is  a permanent feature of the Desire World,  and will
remain so as long  as people continue to think of the New Jerusalem in that
way,  for these  forms have no life apart from the sustained thoughts of
mankind,  and when in time humanity shall have outgrown that faith, the city
created by their  thoughts will  cease to exist.   Its crystal-like appearance
is due to the  exceeding brilliance  of the desire stuff of which it is built.
The  old  alchemists called the Desire World "astral," "starry," on that
account.
Are not the desire bodies left by progressing Egos used by elementals to deceive friends and relatives of the deceased person? How can they be detected and recognized?
   Answer:    When the spirit has passed out at death,
and after a  stay  in Purgatory  of shorter or longer duration enters the
First Heaven,  it  still has with it the desire body used during the earth
life,  but when it  enters the  Second Heaven that desire body is left behind
in a like manner  as  the vital and dense bodies were left at death and
shortly after.  But, while the dense  body goes to decay and disintegrates,
becomes inert and useless  at once when the spirit has left it, it is very
different with the desire body. The material of which that body is composed is
so much more vitalized by the Universal  Spirit that it will retain the
ability to move about a long  time after  the spirit has left.   The shell is
drawn by magnetic  attraction  to those  with whom it associated during earth
life and a memory of  that  past life  very  often enables it to pose
successfully as  a  deceased  relative. This is particularly the case when the
shell is used by an elemental entity.
   These empty shells ensouled by elementals account
very satisfactorily for most of the phenomena encountered at spiritualistic
séances.   The pranks of these  elementals in spilling water down the necks of
the sitters,  throwing chairs, tables and the like about, are specimens of
what may be done by such empty shells when in the possession of elementals.
   As  to how they may be detected or recognized by us,
it will be  evident that while our deceased friends and relatives  during
earth  life possessed common sense,  there is nothing to be gained from the
inane nonsensical communications of these empty shells,  for the spirit which
was in reality  our friend  has passed away,  leaving the house empty.
Therefore we may  judge them by words and acts as we judge people here.
Can elementals assume the shape of animals or reptiles, and what can be done to stop them?
   Answer:    In this material world all the forms are
stable and do not easily  change.   The Desire World is widely different in
that  respect.   The fairy tales,  like the metamorphosis of Cinderella's
mice, etc.,  are actual facts in the Desire World,  for the forms change at
the will of the ensouled life with a lightening-like rapidity,  which is very
bewildering to one  who enters that world as a neophyte.  It is, therefore,
necessary for the clairvoyant to be trained, in order to escape being
glamoured by the form,  which is always changing and may assume any shape at any moment.  When we are able to see the ensouling life, it does not matter what form it takes upon itself for  the  time  being,  we  are not deceived.
Like all others in the Desire World,  elementals have this faculty of changing
their shape,  and it is due to that fact that so many strange tales or visions
seen are thought true  by untrained clairvoyants.   Nothing can be done to
stop elementals from changing their shape,  but we may shoo them away from us
as we chase a serenading feline from below our bedroom window.
How can one avoid becoming obsessed?
   Answer:    Obsession is a state where a discarnate
spirit has taken permanent  possession of the body of someone after
dispossessing the owner.   but sometimes  people who have formed a habit of
drunkenness or some  other  low vice seek to excuse themselves by claiming to
be obsessed.   Wherever a person  makes that statement concerning himself, one
may nearly always be  sure that it is nothing but an excuse,  for a thief who
has stolen something here in  the material world does not go about and tell
people of his theft,  neither  does an obsessing entity go around proclaiming
the fact.   It is  very certain  that  such  an  entity  does not care what is
thought about the man whose body he has stolen,  so that there is no reason
why he should tell and risk being exorcised.
   There  is an infallible means of knowing whether a
person is  really  obsessed,  namely,  by diagnosis of the eye.  "The eye is
the  window  of  the soul,"  and only the true owner is capable of contracting
and expanding  the iris,  or pupil of the eye, so that if we take a person who
claims to be obsessed or whom we think is obsessed,  to a room which is
darkened,  we shall find  that the pupil of his eye will not expand if he is
obsessed.   Neither will the pupil contract when we bring him into the
sunlight,  nor expand  if we  ask him to look at an object at a distance or
contract when he is  asked to read small type.   In short, the pupil of the
eye will respond neither to light nor to distance when a person is obsessed,
but there is also a certain disease called locomotor ataxia, where the iris
will not respond to distance but is responsive to light.
   No  one  who maintains a positive attitude of mind
can  ever  become  obsessed,  for so long as we assert our individuality that
is strong enough to keep  all outsiders away.   But in spiritualistic séances
where the  sitters are negative there is always a great danger.  The best way
to avoid becoming obsessed would be to maintain this positive attitude.   And
anyone who is at all negatively inclined should avoid spiritualistic séances,
crystal gazing and  other  methods of evoking spirits.  That is bad  practice
anyway,  for those  who  have gone beyond have their work to do there and
should  not  be brought back here.
What is psychometry?
   Answer:   Science teaches us that every particle of
matter in the Physical World is interpenetrated by ether,  so that the
chemical atoms of every substance,  no matter how dense, do not touch one
another, but each little atom vibrates  in a field of this all-pervading
ether.   The vibrations  of  this ether  emitted  by every object carry to our
eyes a picture  of  the  things about  us.   This picture is not lost.  The
pictures of all things which  we have consciously observed still exist in the
ether of our vital body, and it only depends upon our ability to call them
back whether we remember them  or not.
   There is also in the ether pervading every object a
picture of the  whole surroundings  of that object.   On the walls of our
rooms are inscribed  all the scenes,  every incident that ever happened in
that room, and even though we  strip them of lath and plaster,  it may be
impossible to get rid of  all the  pictures inscribed there.   If we take a
piece of plaster from  such  a room and bring it to a person who has
cultivated etheric sight,  it is  possible for that person to see the ether in
that piece of plaster, and to tell about  the scenes which happened where that
plaster came from.   If we  show him  a piece of stone taken from the pyramids
of Egypt,  he will  see  those pyramids just as well as if we had brought him
a photograph,  for it is  the ether from an object such as the pyramid that
makes the impression upon  the photographer's sensitive plate, and the only
difference between that impression  and the impression we receive through the
eye is that we are  able  to fix it on the photographic plate,  and  may take
a look at the photograph at any time,  while we are not yet able to clearly
visualize the scenes of  our past under ordinary circumstances.   But the
psychometrist who can read  the ether has a wonderful picture gallery at his
disposal.
Is it true that at spiritualistic séances persons are sometimes transported bodily from one place to another by invisible hands; that flowers are brought into the room through closed windows and doors, and if so, how can that be done?
   Answer:    Yes,  it is perfectly true that such
phenomena as you have mentioned  take place at times under conditions where no
fraud is at  all  possible.  As to the movement of objects, that may be
accomplished by the spirits  in  charge of the séance in various ways.   Hands
may  be  materialized which are either visible or invisible,  and they may
lift objects or persons from one place to another,  or else these objects may
be lifted by the  suspension of the law of gravity so far as that object is
concerned.  As to the passage of flowers through a wall, a closed window or
other material object, we should remember that these objects are not really as
solid as we  usually think.  Science recognizes the fact that no two atoms in
any substance touch one another, but each atom swings and vibrates at a
varying rate of speed in the sea of ether which permeates all matter.  It is
well known also that all substances may be reduced to gas.  Iron,  stone,
water,  or whatever  other substance we name is capable of being thus reduced.
Realizing this,  it is only  a step further to the idea that as these
substances are reduced  to  a gaseous state and as readily resolved back into
their original state,  so  a flower  may be resolved into ether,  passed
between the atoms in a wall  and then  resolved back into its existence as a
flower.   That is in  fact  what happens.
   But the inquirer may say, "Yes, but if you take a
silver dollar,  melt it in  a crucible,  or retort and change it into a gas,
it will not  take  the shape  of a silver dollar when it is resolved back into
the  metallic  state but will become simply a lump of metal."   That is true
where the  operation is  performed by an ordinary man,  who is incapable of
separating the  dense material from its etheric counterpart during the process
of melting, but the spiritual  entities who perform the feats spoken of are
capable of thus  detaching  the ether part of the flower from the dense
material.   And  it  is that etheric part which retains its shape and forms
the matrix or mold which gives  form to the material of the flower when
liberated in the  room  after having been passed through the wall.
Will you kindly explain the use of the planchette?  And state if it is advisable to try to produce the phenomena among amateurs.
   Answer:   The planchette is a small board placed upon
wheels with a device for holding a pencil in a vertical position,  so that
when the medium's hand is  placed  upon the board and moved about by the
spirits  the  pencil  will write  their messages on a sheet of paper.   Like
all  other  spiritualistic phenomena,  planchette writing is produced by a
disembodied spirit through a negative medium.
   When an entity has passed out of earth life and
entered the Invisible Beyond,  an evolution of a different nature from ours
awaits him in  Purgatory and the various heavens.  It is a retrogression when
he tries to communicate with us here under ordinary circumstances.
Therefore,  all  spiritualistic phenomena which bring the disembodied spirit
into contact with the  Physical World  are  to be deprecated as having a bad
effect upon  the  spirits  concerned.   The communicating entities are also
dangerous to the negative sitters in a circle,  who abandon their will powers
and their bodies to a  certain extent.
   Of course in planchette writing the whole body may
not be in trance,  although it sometimes is; but at least an arm is abandoned
to the control of a discarnate  spirit whom the sitter does not see,  and who
may or may not  be what it represents.  If a tramp came to our door and tried
to persuade us to abandon  our house and allow him to take possession for a
little  while,  we would indignantly refuse, but when a tramp  from the Desire
World asks us to let him have possession of our most valuable house,  our
body,  many at once comply,  flattered in the belief that "a dear Angel" has
visited them.   But "dear  Angels"  and philanthropists do not grow on every
bush in the  Desire World any more than here.   It cannot be too often
reiterated that there  is no  transforming power in death;  that an ignorant
Indian does not  suddenly become  all wise by the mere fact of having passed
out at death.   As it  is necessary to study in order to gain knowledge in
this world, so must the departed  spirits  apply themselves if desiring to
learn about  conditions  in that world, and until they have had the requisite
amount of experience,  the departed  are no more fit to guide us from there
than they were while  here. The safest plan is to leave all negative phenomena
alone,  concentrating all our energies on living the Life,  and doing
exercises which foster in us the faculty  of entering that world at will,
either traveling in our finer  vehicles  or  clairvoyantly observing it while
still within  our  dense  body. That is progress; when we have that ability we can see the disembodied entities face to face and judge for ourselves whether it is advisable to  listen to their counsel or not.  Until we can do that we
are at a disadvantage, and caution should teach us to keep on the safe side.
Is a vampire the same as a werewolf?
   Answer:    No,  a vampire is a person who absorbs the
vitality of another, while that which was called a werewolf in medieval times
was the vital body of a low order of black magician.  He would give a gruesome
shape to his vital body, and partly stud it with dense matter in order to
inflict harm upon other people.  The old folk stories said that it was no use
to strike such a thing,  blows would not hurt it.  But if it were stabbed with
a knife or another  sharp  instrument,  it would commence to disgorge the
blood  of  its victims,  run away yelping to its home, and there the black
magician who had manifested  as a wolf could be found suffering from a wound
in  the  precise place where the wolf had been hurt.  This is on account of a
curious circumstance  known to esotericists as repercussion, and the same
phenomena  may  be seen where spirits materialize at a séance.   The ether in
which these spirits materialize has been taken from the body of the medium,
and if a  piece is cut out of the robe of such a spirit,  a piece will be
found missing from the  garment of the medium at the close of the séance.
This fact has  been used by skeptical investigators ignorant of the law of
repercussion to stamp mediums as frauds, when in fact they have been perfectly honest,  though incapable of explaining away the seemingly damning evidence.
What is the difference between a trance medium, a materializing medium, the trained clairvoyant and the ordinary person?
   Answer:   Roughly speaking, we may say that humanity
today is divided into two  classes — those  in whom the connection between the
vital body  and  the dense  body is very close,  and another class where the
connection  is  more loose.   The former class is the ordinary person who is
engaged in  material pursuits and is altogether out of touch with the
Spiritual Worlds.  The latter  class  is  the  so-called sensitives, and is
again  divided  into  two classes.   One  class is actuated by the will from within and  is  positive. From this class comes the trained clairvoyant and
the Invisible Helper.  The other class is negative and is amenable to the will of others.   From  this class mediums are recruited.
   When the connection between the vital body and the
dense body of a man is somewhat lax,  he will be sensitive to spiritual
vibrations, and if positive he  will by his own will develop his spiritual
faculties,  live a  spiritual life  and in time receive the teaching necessary
to become a trained  clairvoyant and a master of his faculty at any and all
times, free to exercise it or not, as he pleases.
   If  a person has this slight laxity between the vital
and  dense  bodies, and  is  of  a negative temperament,  he is liable to
become  the  prey  of discarnate spirits, as a medium.
   Where  the  connection between the vital and dense
body is very  lax,  so that it may be withdrawn,  and the man is positive,  he
may become an Invisible  Helper,  capable of taking the two higher ethers away
from  his  dense body at will and using them as a vehicle for  sense
perception  and memory. He  can  then function consciously in the Spiritual
World and bring  back  a recollection of everything he has done there, so
that, for instance, when he leaves  his body at night he takes up the life in
the Invisible World  in  a fully conscious manner,  as we do here when we wake
up in the morning  after sleep and perform our various duties in the visible
world.
   When  a  person has this lax connection between the
vital  body  and  the dense  body and is of a negative temperament,  the
spirits which  are  earth bound  and seek to manifest here may withdraw his
vital body by way  of  the spleen and temporarily use the ether of which it is
composed to  materialize spirit forms, returning the ether to the medium after
the seance is over.
If mediumship is so dangerous,  why do not the mediums cease to allow themselves to be controlled?
   Answer:   In the first place, of course, the great
majority of the mediums do not realize that there is danger.   They are
particularly unaware of  the enormous danger which threatens them after death.
The desire body may then be  appropriated  by  the  spirit  control.  If they
were to try to stop the influence of the spirit control while still here in
the body they would find that that entity has an exceedingly strong hold upon
them,  a control it  is very difficult to break, and they ought to realize
that naturally when death brings  them into the same world with these spirit
controls the danger  will be still greater.
   The writer has known certain cases where mediums have
balked and tried to escape  from the toils of the spirit control,  but have
failed to break  the strong hold of that entity.   They were helpless.
Mediums have come to the writer for help and told him that they were almost
irresistibly compelled by their spirit controls to commit suicide and murder;
that they had begged and pleaded  with the spirit controls to leave them
alone,  but  without  avail. Cases  are known also where spirit controls have
mercilessly  dragged  their victims out of bed in the middle of night against
their will and forced them to listen to their importunities.   Only seldom
does one hear that they show mercy.   Though  the writer has known mediums who
have been  ill  from  such treatment,  he has only known of one case where the
sickness of  the  medium induced the spirit controls to listen to his plea and
leave him alone for  a few months while he recuperated.
   Thus it will be seen that mediumship, once entered
into, is not usually a matter  of choice with the mediums;  they lose the
power to shut out  spirit controls.   While they do the bidding of their
taskmasters and  are  docile, they may not feel the bit;  but let one of them
try to balk,  and he or  she will soon feel that the spirit control has both
bit and spur,  and is merciless in his use of them.
Reference: The Rosicrucian Philosophy In Questions and Answers, Volume I, by Max Heindel (1865-1919)
This web page has been edited and/or excerpted from reference material, has been modified from its original version, and is in conformance with the web host's Members Terms & Conditions. This website is offered to the public by students of The Rosicrucian Teachings, and has no official affiliation with any organization.